I have an Arc, two Ones for surround, and a Sub Gen 3 in my open plan living room and kitchen area.
The room’s about 39 feet long by 21 feet long and about 70% of it has 18-foot ceilings. The Arc located against one lengthwise wall about 10 feet from the couch, which is in turn about 13 feet from the surround speakers behind it.
I’m wondering whether to replace the surround Ones with Fives. (I have two rooms that each need a single One anyway, so I’m going to have to buy something.)
I have three common usage scenarios:
- Listening to music passively and will moving around at volume 2.
It sounds great for this. My system spends the most hours doing this.
- Watching TV and movies.
The Arc and Sub combo is incredible, but the placement of my surround speakers is 12–13 feet behind my couch, at the entrance to the kitchen area, so I don’t get the full surround experience from the surround speakers.
I accept this tradeoff because I sometimes sit at a table between the living room couch and kitchen areas, and I get great sound for both TV/movies and music when I sit there. (There also wasn’t a natural place to position my speakers appropriately around the couch and I didn’t want to crowd my room with speaker stands.)
- Rocking out.
It’s pretty good for this—the addition of the Sub yesterday helped—but I have to turn the volume to 70–80% to really feel it, and even then I could use a little more impact.
I’m wondering if the Fives would help the surround a bit for scenario #2 (TV), when I’m farther from the surround speakers, and if I’ll get the impact I desire for #3 (rocking out).
I don’t want to lose the great sound I get for #1 (lower-volume passive listening), so if Fives would create a compromise there, I might just stick with the Ones.
I’d really appreciate any input on this.