Skip to main content

Opinion: Era 300 Silent Driver(s)

  • November 3, 2025
  • 1 reply
  • 50 views

AjTrek1

The subject of Era 300 drivers being silent in a particular use case has been broached in this community many times. Below are a few examples:

  • Some users have noted that the inward-facing drivers are not as loud as they expected, while others have found the audio experience to be great.
  • There is a desire for more control over the drivers, with some users suggesting an option to activate the front drivers during music playback, especially when the Era 300s are not being used for home theater.
  • Some users have also expressed a desire to be able to use both sets of drivers, while others are happy with the current setup. 

As you can see the opinions are varied. For the record this author finds no problem with the Era 300 driver configuration(s). However, that’s not to say that you should be of the same opinion. I will add that the question of Era 300 design (IMO) is answered by ​@Jamie A  in the post below:

https://en.community.sonos.com/home-theater-229129/era-300-rear-driver-is-silent-with-arc-ultra-6923569?tid=6923569&fid=229129

Be that as it may…I’d like to throw out an old adage that is “be careful for what you wish for”. The simple meaning is that wanting something will not always provide the results you expect.

Years ago, before Sonos was even an idea the only audio adjustments for music or voice were Treble (high-end) and Bass (low-end). Typically controlled by rotating a knob. There were no visual indicators only one’s ears. The problem that arose (in some instances) is that while one person found the adjustment(s) pleasing another person did not. 

Fast forward and manufacturers introduced Mid-Range adjustments. Mid-Range helped compensate for the adjustments to treble and bass which quite honestly were somewhat drastic in relationship to each other.

To further fine tune the adjustments for Treble, Mid-Range and Bass the Graphic Equalizer was introduced at the consumer level.
 

 

If you have ever played with a Graphic Equalizer, you know that adjustments to one frequency also impact the others. To make things simple; for the uninitiated, the common setting became the “Smile” wherein low-end (on the left) and high-end (on the right) were at the same level above the mid-range thus the “Smile” setting.

Looping back to the Era 300 with certain drivers being silent or extremely quiet. IMO I’d say we should trust that the engineers thoroughly vetted all possible driver actuations for a given audio transmission to provide the best experience. 

Using the adjusts for treble, mid-range and bass as an example we know that adjustments to one frequency influences the others. The Era 300’s are not your ordinary two-channel speakers. There’s a lot of electronic “gimmickry” occurring to produce the immersive effects we experience. 

I’d bet a “dollar to a doughnut ” that if the ability to turn drivers on/off at will were granted; other issues would arise, as the intended balance would be altered. Most likely the posts would shift to “why doesn’t the Era 300 make the proper adjust when driver “A” is turned on/off. Let’s makes that a feature request.”

I’m not saying that I’m 100% correct in my assumption. However, given the complexity the Era 300’s an argument can be made that limiting consumer adjustments is design intentional.

To close…continue to make your desires known regarding the Era 300’s, as bugs can arise. However, consider that some design requests for additional control over the speaker; as discussed herein, may not be granted; in order to avoid further complications and/or user dissatisfaction.

1 reply

Stanley_4
  • Lead Maestro
  • November 3, 2025

Looking at the can-of-worms involved in trying to test an Atmos setup and that I'm happy with my 300s, both as surrounds and as an Atmos/stereo Pair I just can't get interested in this whole debate. The Atmos impact of alternate speaker on/off settings adds a few more worms to the can.

I'm firmly in the "give them a listening trial and decide" camp. Happy, keep them, not happy, send them back and go look for something better. 

Unrelated, but connecting eventually. I had the graphic equalizer you used for an example. It was pretty decent as the top of the Pioneer line, and there wasn't noticeable out-of-band impact from the individual adjustments. I pretty much set mine to the inverse of my latest hearing test results hoping to get close to what good ears would hear. Later with fancy equalizer that did speaker/room analysis I ran the automatic test to get the sound right and then tweaked it to counter my hearing issues.

All that leading up to the desire for more ffequency adjustability in the speakers, and even more so in my Ace, which won't work alongside my hearing aids.  Being able to have two stored speaker profiles (aids in and out) would also be great.