Skip to main content

Smaller Sub


Anyone else thinking up of a bunch of uses of a smaller, less-expensive Sub? Especially zones with in-ceiling speakers or a modest Playbar setup. Nothing drastically different on overall design, just smaller and costing $500...
Did you find what you were looking for?
This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.

15 replies

  • Lyricist II
  • 3 replies
  • January 18, 2014
especially in a small room it's a great idea. the SUB they have now is expensive and overkill for a small bedroom or office. give us a mini.

@JorgeBalogh: @SonosSupport I have a suggestion! A smaller #SUB maybe called #SUB:1 for smaller rooms! Perfect to integrated with a pair of PLAY:1

  • Lyricist I
  • 1 reply
  • May 28, 2014
Great idea, I have been holding off buying the sub to go with my Playbar and 2 Play:1, I would buy SUB:1 in a heart beat !

  • Contributor I
  • 1 reply
  • February 14, 2015
This reply was created from a merged topic originally titled Any chance you would consider producing a smaller version of the subwoofer?.

Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Enthusiast I
  • 130 replies
  • February 16, 2015
This has been going for a while but would like to add my support. Two play3's make a great sounding stereo pair. A Sub of a similar size would really enhance them. There are plenty of great sounding subs of this size on PC 2.1 systems so it must be possible in this package size.

Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Contributor III
  • 11 replies
  • February 27, 2015
I want to add my support. I can easily afford a Sub, but I would like a smaller one, there is no space for the big one. A SUB1 would be bought tomorrow.

I could not agree anymore the sub one is a phenomenal idea and I think almost every Sonos user would purchase it if they do not have the regular sub right now.

  • Lyricist II
  • 3 replies
  • May 24, 2015
I have 2 big subs right now and would buy 2 small subs for the play 1's today if they were as good.

  • Lyricist II
  • 3 replies
  • May 24, 2015
I also would like to have a smaller "Sub:1" for use with a Play:1 stereo pair.

  • Lyricist III
  • 8 replies
  • July 27, 2015
Yes please! One that can also be used to pair with a Play:5! 🙂

A Play5 has decent bass on its own... doubt if you would get much more without going to a full size sub.

  • Lyricist III
  • 8 replies
  • July 27, 2015
I have two Play:5's. I do want a mini-sub! 😉 and ofcourse it would add bass. I have a Minirig Sub (portable) and that works perfectly for portable use.

  • Lyricist II
  • 3 replies
  • February 28, 2016
I'd add my vote for a Sub:1. I don't want to spend £599 on a sub just to improve the (noticeably lacking) bass response on my Playbar. The current Sub is overkill. I'd happily spend £300 on a sub half the size.

  • Lyricist I
  • 1 reply
  • September 18, 2018
+1 For a smaller sub. The current sub is overkill when the setup is beam+2xone for surround sound. Something smaller, cheaper, less powerful and more easily placed would be ideal.

Stanley_4
  • Lead Maestro
  • 11115 replies
  • September 18, 2018
And designed so kids and cats can't drop stuff inside!

Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings