Skip to main content
Headliner I
May 19, 2026
Answered

Ceiling Mounting ERA 300's

Just read a very helpful thread on ERA300’s ceiling mount Vs In ceiling ….. 

I have the same issue. Probably easier than the OP on that thread. We have a rectangular room. But with a large triangular corner in glass. Long story, looks nice etc but not ideal for placing speakers.

The front viewing wall is perfectly symetrical and has just been rewired so TV, sound bar and other components are perfectly centered as is the viewing settee. The viewing settee has a left hand and right hand 2 seater settee perpendicular to the main viewing settee.

So everything is front is peachy. But the rear means the ERA 300 RHS would be over the arm if wall mounted. Not ideal. The LHS one not a problem. 

Can use floor stands but I’m thinking ceiling mounted on a Flexson and use SW in app to invert the sound? The flexson appears have a long reach such that it could be in a proper position in line with the Arc Ultra.

This is the Flexson ceiling mount in question. not the prettiest but maybe works.

Install is no problem. The room is hacked and channelled to bits so that RJ45, power and decent audio cable runs to each position …. center, LHS F, RHS F, High level LHS F, High Level RHS F, rear LHS and rear RHS. I can easily run feeds into the ceiling and the whole room will be replastered and decorated. So a full hand of options is open to use …. save the unbalnced wall mount.

Question is, which is the best ….. floor mount or can I get away without loss with ceiling mounts?

This is the Flexson …

 

This is the decent symetrical wall with TV central and all the connections 1st fixed …. Not pretty but ...

 

This is the problem wall ….. with a double glass door eating up 25% of the wall mounting….

 

Floor speakers could work. Seen some nice Oak ones but loose cables are a bit Meh and prone to hyperactive grandkids. Ceiling ones are zero problem to install but would it be as good?

Would appreciate any input whilst we are at the dusty, painful chop at phase of work. 

 

 

….. and from another angle

This sort of floor stand looks nice (the cosmetic is also a part of this …. trying get the lot done in white and oak) but unsure if it’s good from an audio point of view …. not sure just sitting on a wood plinth is optimum? 

 

https://audiochic.co.uk/products/sonos-era-300-speaker-stands-140-900mm-pair?srsltid=AfmBOopaEVX3--OPyMf75aHvRsKp1LO7lrGHzz6k5SI12uXefbMp8pKO

AjTrek1
AjTrek1Answer
May 26, 2026

Nice looking stands. I’d follow the height measurements as the Sonos Era 300’s shown in the link.

On another note I prefer the minimalist aspect of the Sonos stands. I have a set of Black and White and they (stands) disappear into the room aesthetics. 😊

https://www.sonos.com/en-us/shop/sonos-era-300-stand-pair

 

 

Thanks for sharing that. They stand a little higher than I imagined at 957mm but not a problem. And they do look good in the white and at a lot lower price point. Must say it had escaped me that Sonos suplied these. 

We have a load of white and oak in the room so either could work nicely.

FYI, regarding speaker wires (power cord)….they actually are embedded in a grove that runs the length of the support pole and exits at the base of the stand.

Together Everyone Achieves More = T.E.A.M.

59 replies

Headliner I
June 2, 2026

Interesting article just read adding to the long standing Sonos L C R and LR RR debate …… on Tech Radar earlier today …..

 

Only an opinion piece but an opinion I have to say I share somewhat …… I guess it’s as simple as ‘why not?’ ….. would make my OTT wiring prep worthwhile :-) ……

 

https://www.techradar.com/televisions/home-theater/okay-sonos-where-is-my-tv-sound-system-with-real-left-and-right-front-speakers-sony-beat-you-to-to-the-punch-the-tech-secretly-exists-in-your-products-already-its-time-to-catch-up

 

Headliner I
June 16, 2026

I don’t know if this post will be deleted … I posted on here about the sonosequencer software that for reasons I cannot begin to fathom, seemed to cause upset to mods. 

 

Anyway, the rumour machine on ERA 500 was added to today …. I will not quote any content in case it upsets someone at the back end of this but feel free to read …. it adds some meat to the bones of a ‘possible’ ERA 500 product …..

https://www.headphonesty.com/2026/06/sonos-era-500-release/

For what it’s worth I would part money for two pairs of such a product instantly.

 

Airgetlam
June 16, 2026

The automated system frequently seems to trigger on outside links, but both of your posts seem to have come through. Don’t know if they were initially caught by ‘the system’, then approved by a human, or came through without intervention.

Thanks for the information, I was unaware of the FCC filing, I don’t spend any time trolling the net for that type of data. I’m somewhat unsurprised that a ‘new’ device has a set of extended features such as are predicted in the article…the Five was designed many, many years ago, getting newer chipsets that have expanded capabilities must be significantly easier and cheaper than when the Five was originally designed. 
 

I’d likely be interested in a pair as well. My current ‘critical listening’ setup is two PLAY:5 gen 2s. Which still work magnificently for me, using S2, and sounding great. Most of those ‘features’ that the article purports the rumored Era 500 to have, are to me ‘nice to haves’ more than requirements. 

Bruce
AjTrek1
June 16, 2026

Since this is a semi-hijack of this post I’ll respond as well 😂

Regarding an Era 500. There’s no doubt that Five Series current and previous is getting old in the tooth. All the new bells and whistles are nice looking at BT, voice assistant, and auto tuning.

The addition of the USB-C connectivity IMO is more of “ let’s get with the times” as eliminating the line-in 3.5mm will require users to purchase the Sonos proprietary dongle. More profit for Sonos. Slim chance Sonos will offer both options to accommodate legacy users of the 3.5mm who may already e using it.

All the above said I don’t want to see the stereo advantage offered by the Five diminished in favor of adding Dolby Atmos to an Era 500.  If anything I want to see (hear) an improvement in the stereo imaging.

Also, IMO Sonos would have two competing products with Dolby Atmos (Era 300). From a marketing standpoint that’s gotta be a hard sell. When looking at price point. Either the sales of the Era 300 drop or sales of the Era 500 suffer.

I’m very aware of the elephant in the room that will have potential buyers clamoring for Dolby Atmos on an Era 500 and the potential nay sayers claiming Sonos missed the mark. As with buyers “enough is never enough”.

Oh…I almost forgot…the argument about being able to control which drivers are activated when playing a source. I’m just saying…🤷

Together Everyone Achieves More = T.E.A.M.
Stanley_4
Grand Maestro
June 16, 2026

Going to a USB C input and deleting both the 3.5 mm and Ethernet options will save costs for Sonos, save power draw (a watt or two) for the Ethernet and maybe a few cents off the cost for the consumer.

Sonos isn't likely making enough profit on either/both USB adapters to make them a viable product. If they were we'd be seeing knockoffs at a cheaper price by now. They exist now more to provide a review tick-box check, and for a very few users with special needs. Maybe have a future in commercial deployments but that would really need power over Ethernet version to also be available.

AjTrek1
June 16, 2026

Ethernet and 3.5mm input will most likely still be available on the Era 500 by using the combo adapter as shown in the link. The only difference being the legacy ports/input will be eliminated. That said there may be a cosmetic savings in housing design; but the internal components/interface chips will still be present. BTW…Ethernet is still necessary for a forced update by Sonos. 

https://www.sonos.com/en-us/shop/sonos-combo-adapter

Together Everyone Achieves More = T.E.A.M.
Stanley_4
Grand Maestro
June 16, 2026

For Ethernet the biggest power consumption and expensive bits are in the cable interface, that would reside on the adapter, not internally.

The forced update issue will be interesting to follow as more devices lack the Ethernet port. Be a bit grumpy if someone told me I'd need to drop $40 to get an updat.e

AjTrek1
June 16, 2026

For Ethernet the biggest power consumption and expensive bits are in the cable interface, that would reside on the adapter, not internally.

The forced update issue will be interesting to follow as more devices lack the Ethernet port. Be a bit grumpy if someone told me I'd need to drop $40 to get an updat.e

The same can said for the 3.5mm port. As of now one only needs an RCA to 3.5mm cable to connect a Turntable to a Five. Most likely going forward one will need the RCA to 3.5mm cable and the Sonos adapter. Dollars will be expended regardless of what one wants to accomplish (i.e. a forced update or just adding a peripheral device). Doing the latter is a few dollars cheaper.

Together Everyone Achieves More = T.E.A.M.
Stanley_4
Grand Maestro
June 16, 2026

We are going to have to continue disagree on the power draw and cost of the respective Ethernet and audio components.

If anyone cares the information on Ethernet is available elsewhere, make sure to compare the older 10/100 Sonos uses, not the more expensive and higher power 1000 interface components.

Headliner I
June 16, 2026

The automated system frequently seems to trigger on outside links, but both of your posts seem to have come through. Don’t know if they were initially caught by ‘the system’, then approved by a human, or came through without intervention.

Thanks for the information, I was unaware of the FCC filing, I don’t spend any time trolling the net for that type of data. I’m somewhat unsurprised that a ‘new’ device has a set of extended features such as are predicted in the article…the Five was designed many, many years ago, getting newer chipsets that have expanded capabilities must be significantly easier and cheaper than when the Five was originally designed. 
 

I’d likely be interested in a pair as well. My current ‘critical listening’ setup is two PLAY:5 gen 2s. Which still work magnificently for me, using S2, and sounding great. Most of those ‘features’ that the article purports the rumored Era 500 to have, are to me ‘nice to haves’ more than requirements. 

Makes sense Bruce and indeed I do see both responses so maybe I was a tad quick to carp.

Yeah the rumour things does seem have a bit more legs than it did. Can’t be anything but a good thing if it materialises.

For me, it’s less the detailed technical differences (although it should be) but more that I don’t want to shell out on my new home theater set up then find there’s something a tad better in the wings. 

The opportunity to set up a whole room with great new stuff doesn’t happen so often so often, so when you do, you want to know you got it spot on. For once I think I’m in the sweet spot with the LG W6, the Arc Ultra, a couple of Sub 4’s and a set of potentially ERA 500’s … let’s see. And indeed I have anther room that can benefit from a second set of 500’s.