Skip to main content

A Plea for Openness: Sonos, Let’s Build a Better Future Together


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Trending Lyricist I
  • 15 replies

Dear Sonos Team,

As a devoted user of your products, I want to express both my admiration for the groundbreaking work you’ve done in audio technology and my growing frustration with the challenges your closed ecosystem has created. Recent months have brought these frustrations to a boiling point, as nearly every review on app stores, forums, and social media is filled with complaints about the Sonos experience. It’s heartbreaking to see such a beloved brand risk alienating its most loyal customers.

 

The Frustration Is Real and Growing

The issues with the app update earlier this year are a glaring example of what happens when users are locked into a system they can’t control. Missing features, bugs, and a lack of transparency left many of us in the dark, relying solely on Sonos to fix problems that persisted for months. In the meantime, your community—your greatest advocates—has been venting its frustration everywhere, from the app store to your forums.

Search “Sonos app review,” and you’ll see an overwhelming trend: a once-great experience has been overshadowed by usability issues, connectivity problems, and customer service struggles. This isn’t just a minor hiccup—it’s a pattern that’s eroding trust.

 

Why Ruin a Great Company?

Sonos is at a crossroads. The app debacle, compounded by years of complaints about the limitations of your closed ecosystem, has put your reputation at risk. And it’s such a shame because the potential to make Sonos truly exceptional is within reach.

 

What’s most perplexing is that Sonos software relies on open-source technologies. These open-source components are built by communities that thrive on transparency, collaboration, and shared innovation. Yet, Sonos users are locked out of contributing to or modifying the system. Why not honor the spirit of open source by inviting your community to help improve the Sonos ecosystem?

 

The Opportunity to Show Goodwill

This is not about placing blame—it's about urging you to see the immense goodwill and opportunities you could generate by embracing openness. Imagine the positive change that could come from making your software open source or giving users more control over their systems. You’d be showing your customers that you trust them, value their input, and are committed to a truly user-centric experience.

 

Better Solutions, Faster: Users could contribute fixes, develop features, and address pain points far faster than a single company ever could.

 

A Community of Advocates: Empowering users creates loyalty and goodwill. People want to invest in a company that listens and values their feedback.

 

Setting the Standard in the Industry: By opening your ecosystem, Sonos could set a new benchmark in the audio market, differentiating itself from competitors like Apple or Google who tightly control their ecosystems.

 

A Better Way Forward

Sonos is built on great hardware, incredible sound quality, and a loyal user base. These are the foundations of a company that should be leading the way in innovation, not struggling to keep pace. By embracing openness, you wouldn’t just solve immediate issues; you’d transform Sonos into a company that users feel proud to support—a company that people trust to do the right thing.

 

Sonos doesn’t have to go down this road of mounting frustration and alienation. You can make a choice to show goodwill, to collaborate with your users, and to honor the open-source principles that helped build your software in the first place. This isn’t just about fixing problems—it’s about creating a brand that thrives on innovation, transparency, and user trust.

 

Please, don’t let Sonos become a story of missed opportunities and customer abandonment. Let it be the company that listens, adapts, and leads.

 

Sincerely,

 

A Loyal (but Frustrated) Sonos User

 

Did you find what you were looking for?
This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.

12 replies

jgatie
  • 27636 replies
  • December 2, 2024

Gee, if only there were a similar product that used Open Source and allowed users to contribute to the code.  Oh yeah, there was - Squeezebox.  Known for being slow, hard to configure, not synching too well, quirky, constant “you need to load the latest beta” advice in order keep it running, and eventually defunct hardware and discontinuation due to the Open Source code being ported to Raspberry Pi hardware that was 1/5 the cost.


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Trending Lyricist I
  • 15 replies
  • February 6, 2025

In light of recent developments at Sonos, including the layoff of approximately 200 employees and significant organizational restructuring , it's evident that the company is facing substantial challenges. These issues have been compounded by a problematic app update that led to customer dissatisfaction and the resignation of former CEO Patrick Spence.

 

To navigate these turbulent times, embracing open-source principles could be a transformative strategy for Sonos. Open-source development fosters innovation, transparency, and community engagement. By opening its software to external developers and users, Sonos can leverage a broader pool of talent to identify and resolve issues more efficiently, ensuring a more robust and user-friendly product.


jgatie
  • 27636 replies
  • February 6, 2025

I’ve been a user and fan of Sonos for the better part of 20 years.  I can positively say there’s only one thing that will make me drop them like a bad habit, and that is them moving to Open Source.  


Stanley_4
  • Lead Maestro
  • 11223 replies
  • February 6, 2025

Open Source is all well and good for the core Operating System, it does come at a price in time and effort even if it is “free” to use. The restrictions on modification and sharing are also a bit of a drawback for many open source licences.

For the application code open source makes no sense, too much time and effort went into building a unique, and patent-able, design to just give it away.


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Trending Lyricist I
  • 15 replies
  • February 6, 2025

You're absolutely right—open source can have its challenges! It’s not a magic solution, and it’s definitely not the right fit for everything. But it’s funny how some of the biggest companies—Google (Chromium, Android), Meta (Llama AI), and even Microsoft (huge Linux contributor)—are using it to innovate and stay competitive.

 

Open source doesn’t mean just “giving everything away for free.” Many successful companies strike a balance, keeping their secret sauce proprietary while opening up parts that benefit from collaboration. It can speed up innovation, improve security, and build stronger user trust.

 

So, while open source isn’t perfect, it’s not the disaster some might think. When done right, it can actually be a huge advantage!

And it's clear that Sonos is struggling to manage the developing on its own

 


melvimbe
  • 9847 replies
  • February 6, 2025
Stanley_4 wrote:

For the application code open source makes no sense, too much time and effort went into building a unique, and patent-able, design to just give it away.

 

The patents, I think, would be a huge issue here.   Admittedly, I don’t know a ton about how open sources licenses work, but I would think the numerous patents that Sonos hold, including ones they bought whole companies to acquire and sued Google to protect, would be in jeopary if the source code were open.

 

Besides, the APIs are open, and there are 3rd party companies that make controllers available as well as open source projects, that utilize those APIs. 


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Trending Lyricist I
  • 15 replies
  • February 6, 2025

Sure, patents could complicate things, and open-source licenses can be tricky. But opening APIs isn’t really the same as open source.

APIs allow third parties to build around a system, but they don’t give access to improve or change the core technology itself. True open source would mean letting the community contribute directly—fixing issues, optimizing performance, and even bringing in new features, even if it's only, for a certain area of the software.

Having open APIs is definitely a step, but it’s not quite the same as real open-source collaboration, where developers can work alongside the company to make things better for everyone.

 


jgatie
  • 27636 replies
  • February 6, 2025

There’s already been one Open Source multi-room streamer, Squeezebox.  It was plagued by buggy software, “load the latest beta” advice from the support staff, lousy sync, and a myriad of other problems due to amateur programmers trying to take on audio streaming, which requires specialized skill.  It eventually was discontinued because sales plummeted once people figured out they could run the Open Source firmware on a Raspberry Pi for 1/4th the cost of the Squeezebox hardware. 

Not exactly the product life cycle one wishes to mimic.


Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Trending Lyricist I
  • 15 replies
  • February 6, 2025

Despite the discontinuation of official support, Squeezebox devices have remained functional largely due to their open-source nature. The community has continued to develop and maintain the Logitech Media Server (now known as Lyrion Music Server), ensuring that these devices can still be used effectively. 

While it's true that Squeezebox faced challenges, such as software bugs and synchronization issues, the open-source community has played a crucial role in extending the lifespan of these devices. Even after Logitech announced the shutdown of MySqueezebox.com in early 2024, users have been able to set up local servers to continue using their devices. 

This example shows that open-source projects can offer longevity and adaptability, even when official support ends.


jgatie
  • 27636 replies
  • February 6, 2025
Gatso90 wrote:

Despite the discontinuation of official support, Squeezebox devices have remained functional largely due to their open-source nature. The community has continued to develop and maintain the Logitech Media Server (now known as Lyrion Music Server), ensuring that these devices can still be used effectively. 

While it's true that Squeezebox faced challenges, such as software bugs and synchronization issues, the open-source community has played a crucial role in extending the lifespan of these devices. Even after Logitech announced the shutdown of MySqueezebox.com in early 2024, users have been able to set up local servers to continue using their devices. 

This example shows that open-source projects can offer longevity and adaptability, even when official support ends.

 

You just stated very eloquently why Sonos should never go Open Source.  


melvimbe
  • 9847 replies
  • February 6, 2025
Gatso90 wrote:

Sure, patents could complicate things, and open-source licenses can be tricky. But opening APIs isn’t really the same as open source.

APIs allow third parties to build around a system, but they don’t give access to improve or change the core technology itself. True open source would mean letting the community contribute directly—fixing issues, optimizing performance, and even bringing in new features, even if it's only, for a certain area of the software.

Having open APIs is definitely a step, but it’s not quite the same as real open-source collaboration, where developers can work alongside the company to make things better for everyone.

 

I understand that APIs are not the same as having the code fullly open, but I would bet that it exposes pretty much all Sonos wants to expose to the general public. If Sonos opened it further they would need to make sure not to display their patented code as well as give away any secrets regarding upcoming functionality and products.  Maybe they could put this open source developers under NDA, but Sonos already has a leak problem.

Also worth nothing that one of the more popular apps that uses Sonos APIs, Sonos  Sequencer, allows users to setup speakers in ways that Sonos doesn’t support.


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
Gatso90 wrote:

 

This example shows that open-source projects can offer longevity and adaptability, even when official support ends.

Buy Sonos products with a line in. Use whatever open source player you want with your Sonos and never interact with the Sonos software if you want. 


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings