Skip to main content

Streaming Apple Music Lossless: What I Learned

  • November 7, 2025
  • 10 replies
  • 124 views

AjTrek1

Hello:

Everyone should know by now that Sonos can be susceptible to wireless interference from any number of sources/devices such as: 

  • Microwave ovens
  • Baby Monitors
  • Crowded Wi-Fi neighborhoods
  • Wi-Fi appliances
  • Security Systems
  • Cameras

Therefore, one way to mitigate the interference is to have a stable network. However, I’m not going to discuss network configurations as that’s a subject for another time. I’m sure you can find any number of discussions on networks in this community.

What I do want to discuss is Steaming Apple Music Lossless. Many have complained about stuttering, songs stopping abruptly and/or skipping to the next or worst-case scenario the music just STOPS! 

The above seems to be more prevalent Streaming Apple Music Lossless when several rooms are grouped. As a side-note Sonos is very chatty on its own and can tax a network. Grouping several rooms can compound the issue of taxing a network as doing so requires more buffering to keep the stream going across multiple rooms.

Getting back to streaming Apple Music Lossless…more buffering is required versus streaming non-lossless two-channel audio. The more rooms grouped the more buffering required. 

Today, I decided to experiment streaming Apple Lossless over five (5) rooms grouped. I started the stream at 8:00AM CST_US. As of this post its now 4:07PM_CST_US (eight hours later). The stream of Apple Music Lossless has been consistent except for one glitch…the Music Stopped! 

So now I’m wondering maybe there is an issue streaming Apple Music Lossless. So, I started the stream once more and after a few songs the music stopped again. Now I’m confused as I’ve grouped five (5) rooms before when streaming Apple Music Lossless without issue. 

By pure accident (or quirk of fate) I discovered the issue (at least in my case). I had grouped a stereo pair of Era 300’s with Sub3 that I hadn’t included before. The Era 300’s are located near my front door which has an Arlo Camera Doorbell and an Arlo security camera outside aiming from the left. UPS so happened to deliver a package and of course the doorbell camera and the security camera captured the UPS driver. Upon doing so the music stopped. WOW!

I decided to further test the occurrence, so I disabled the doorbell and security cameras. I exited my home from the rear and went around to the front and approached my door just as the UPS driver had done.  Apple Music Lossless continued to play. I re-enabled the cameras and repeated my exit and approach routine. Upon being captured by the cameras the music stopped. One more time for good measure I disabled the cameras and repeated the experiment….the music did not stop. 

I continued to stream Apple Music Lossless (as grouped) with no issue for the remainder of the time as mentioned above. It’s clear to me that my security cameras can negatively impact an Apple Music Lossless stream.

Should I petition Sonos to fix the Apple Music Lossless API…. I think not. Rather than blame Sonos (as many have done) regarding Apple Music Lossless streams having issues; maybe doing a bit of investigation regarding one’s environment will help. 

In my case will I be disabling my doorbell and security camera to stream Apple Music Lossless…I should say not! However, I will be more mindful of my room groupings (with Apple Music Lossless) and not try to tax my network beyond it’s limits. Besides, grouping five (5) rooms is not necessary and was only done as an experiment. 

BTW…my network in case you’re interested consists of:

  • ASUS Wi-Fi 7 AiMesh
  • ASUS routers x 3
  • Wired Backhaul
  • 3GB incoming via Google Fiber *

I hope someone finds this information useful. Enjoy your Sonos and Apple Music Lossless streams.

 

 * I’m quite aware that 3GB incoming does not translate into the same over Wi-Fi

10 replies

Airgetlam
  • November 8, 2025

You’ve also missed the fact that LANs, wired and WiFi,  reconfigure itself often, due to external issues, it isn’t ‘static’ by any means. Even if ‘you’ don’t change it, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t change itself. 


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Enthusiast I
  • November 8, 2025

What steps are you considering to address this? 


AjTrek1
  • Author
  • November 8, 2025

You’ve also missed the fact that WiFi reconfigures itself often, due to external issues, it isn’t ‘static’ by any means. Even if ‘you’ don’t change it, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t change itself. 

OK… but can you tie your point into how it relates to Apple Music Lossless streaming. 


AjTrek1
  • Author
  • November 8, 2025

What steps are you considering to address this? 

There are no other steps to address other than what I mentioned in my post. If you have a solution(s) for wireless interference I love to hear it (them).


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Enthusiast I
  • November 8, 2025

What steps are you considering to address this? 

There are no other steps to address other than what I mentioned in my post. If you have a solution(s) for wireless interference I loved to hear it (them).

It would be unusual for your cameras to cause wireless interference. Arlo cameras (and other brands of wifi cameras) themselves don’t typically create Wi‑Fi issues, but setup or configuration problems can lead to interference especially on 2.4 GHz channels.


Stanley_4
  • Lead Maestro
  • November 8, 2025

My multi camera system caused many issues, not just Sonos, when streaming HD over wifi. Checking channel utilization it was easy to see that the channel was being asked to do more than it could do cleanly. Data did get through but pauses and glitches in applications moving data were obvious.

My first solution (not appreciated by others nearby) was to put up another access point on a different channel. That had that channel's utilization higher than desirable and there were still visible camera glitches. But it did free up space on my original channel/AP that restored proper Sonos operation.

Final solution was to run Ethernet to the cameras and quit hogging one of the three available channels.

 

Im not in trouble here yet, but I sure wish I could restrict non-Atmos streaming to CD quality to keep my data throughput requirements lower. I don't have a good handle on Atmos data needs but keeping the bitrate and depth to reasonable (no audibile degradation) levels would also be good.

Newer Sonos with more available channels are going to be a big help once my older Sonos gear ages out but that is (hopefully) years in the future.


AjTrek1
  • Author
  • November 8, 2025

What steps are you considering to address this? 

There are no other steps to address other than what I mentioned in my post. If you have a solution(s) for wireless interference I loved to hear it (them).

It would be unusual for your cameras to cause wireless interference. Arlo cameras (and other brands of wifi cameras) themselves don’t typically create Wi‑Fi issues, but setup or configuration problems can lead to interference especially on 2.4 GHz channels.

What? Unusual? What planet are you living on? I don’t have the time nor the inclination to provide you the data on interference that wireless cameras can cause. Here’s an AI synopsis. Yeah it’s AI so believe it or not; or do your own research.

  • Wireless cameras can cause interference, primarily by competing for the same wireless frequencies used by your Wi-Fi network, especially the crowded 2.4GHz band. This can lead to slower internet speeds and dropped camera connections due to signal overlap from other devices like microwaves, Bluetooth devices, and other Wi-Fi networks. 

Stanley_4
  • Lead Maestro
  • November 8, 2025

Rough numbers, when wired, my cameras needed about 20 Mbps. On wireless you have to add in the protocol overhead, retried transmissions and all the other wifi issues. Naturally the overhead and losses increase as channel utilization gets higher.

http://stardot.com/bandwidth-and-storage-calculator

https://info.support.huawei.com/info-finder/encyclopedia/en/Channel+Utilization.html

https://www.netally.com/tech-tips/wifi-channel-scanning-a-guide-to-wifi-channels/

 


Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Enthusiast I
  • November 11, 2025

What steps are you considering to address this? 

There are no other steps to address other than what I mentioned in my post. If you have a solution(s) for wireless interference I loved to hear it (them).

It would be unusual for your cameras to cause wireless interference. Arlo cameras (and other brands of wifi cameras) themselves don’t typically create Wi‑Fi issues, but setup or configuration problems can lead to interference especially on 2.4 GHz channels.

What? Unusual? What planet are you living on? I don’t have the time nor the inclination to provide you the data on interference that wireless cameras can cause. Here’s an AI synopsis. Yeah it’s AI so believe it or not; or do your own research.

  • Wireless cameras can cause interference, primarily by competing for the same wireless frequencies used by your Wi-Fi network, especially the crowded 2.4GHz band. This can lead to slower internet speeds and dropped camera connections due to signal overlap from other devices like microwaves, Bluetooth devices, and other Wi-Fi networks. 


Has your AI helped you out yet? It would drive me crazy if my Wi‑Fi $$$$setup fell apart every time my wifi camera uploaded a 12‑second clip to the cloud. 
 

 


Forum|alt.badge.img+18
  • Prodigy II
  • November 11, 2025

[Edited]

I have my Sonos speakers on the 5ghz wifi (other than home theatre, on a different mesh node) so that the Ring doorbell on 2.4ghz wifi never impacts Sonos/Apple Music Lossless streams.