Skip to main content
Contributor I
December 14, 2018

CD player to Sonos speakers?

Brand new to Sonos, don't own anything of the brand yet.
My wife doesn't do streaming, we have ~300 CDs, and she wants a CD Changer/Carousel. We just moved, so I have to rebuild the audio system. Good news is that they still make CD carousels. But I don't really want to invest in another old-school audio system...I'd like to integrate the CD carousel into a Sonos system.

What is the best approach? Will a Connect work for this? Or do I need a Connect: Amp? If I want stereo, are two Sonos Ones a good start?

thanks for sharing your expertise!
    This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.

    36 replies

    jgatie
    April 5, 2019

    The only artists who profit from streaming are huge pop stars. How are young, less commercial artists supposed to forge a career in music with the streaming model? It leads to bland music.


    Sorry, but actual numbers say otherwise. From the above link:

    Music used to be dominated by audiences with the most spending power – so middle-class, middle-aged people, buying albums at Tesco as part of their weekly shop, often decided what topped the charts. Now, Afrobeat, Danish rap, hundreds of genres of niche electronic music and particularly British urban music are flourishing commercially, without having to make any concessions to the mainstream.

    “Before, you had to get on mainstream radio, have a certain style or sound,” says Boateng. “It’s allowing for a more diverse proposition for British music and a wider range of people who are stars. A generation are coming through and feeling free.”
    Lyricist III
    April 6, 2019

    The only artists who profit from streaming are huge pop stars. How are young, less commercial artists supposed to forge a career in music with the streaming model? It leads to bland music.


    Sorry, but actual numbers say otherwise. From the above link:

    Music used to be dominated by audiences with the most spending power – so middle-class, middle-aged people, buying albums at Tesco as part of their weekly shop, often decided what topped the charts. Now, Afrobeat, Danish rap, hundreds of genres of niche electronic music and particularly British urban music are flourishing commercially, without having to make any concessions to the mainstream.

    “Before, you had to get on mainstream radio, have a certain style or sound,” says Boateng. “It’s allowing for a more diverse proposition for British music and a wider range of people who are stars. A generation are coming through and feeling free.”


    Ha yeah keep on believing that dude, if it makes you feel better..
    April 6, 2019

    Yes, I've always considered these arguments rather specious, too... I've never been convinced of the claimed extent of harm to artists.


    See the post linked to by pwt above. The income from CD's dropped like a stone after Napster. All those "I wouldn't have bought that CD anyway" and "Napster allows me to sample music that I will then go buy" arguments were nothing but a justification for theft. Very few bought music when they could get it for free, and the sales numbers proved it.


    "Not quite: he was the head of Universal Music’s Nordic operation." - so, no bias there, then....
    April 6, 2019
    I am not at all surprised that " very few bought music when they could get it free". There will always be exceptions, and some of those that say so here are those, even honourable ones, but human nature in general will not be defeated or changed in a hurry. When has anyone bought something when it was available for free, risk free? Who washes rented cars?

    What I found interesting about the Guardian article is this:
    "Varma strikes another note of caution: although previously artists weren’t making much money from record sales, they were able to develop a financial connection with their fans through touring or merchandise. Now that’s being lost. “Streaming often has no bearing on whether people want to buy tickets or a physical album,” says Varma. “The audience is pretty passive for most huge streaming acts. For Jones, we found out that many people streaming her didn’t even know who she was; they were streaming her on a playlist alongside 50 other songs.”

    The nature of the game has changed with the change in the technology and so have the rules of the game. Those that will play the game successfully are those that will adapt to the new rules. This too has happened over and over in different times in different industries, so the music industry won't be immune to this phenomenon. Also, streaming mean that the rubbish filler tracks that previously earned money by the sale of the CD will no longer do so; people will only stream and pay for the music they like, and that is something that artistes have to learn to live with.

    And now we are completely off topic:D.
    jgatie
    April 6, 2019
    Ha yeah keep on believing that dude, if it makes you feel better..

    Devastating comeback. :8
    Ken_Griffiths
    April 6, 2019
    You’re all perhaps missing the most important point ...and that is after ripping, they still make great coasters.?