I have the Arc soundbar speaker and am waiting for my Sub (Gen 3) to arrive. A friend of mine has the Beam soundbar speaker and uses two Sonos 5’s for his rear surround speakers but doesn’t have a sub. I would like to know if surround speakers are required or recommended with my projected setup; Arc SL and Sub. I think the Arc soundbar already sounds great but gets distorted during high bass or is “missing” some bass. I think the Sub will provide what I believe is missing in my future setup and the rear surrounds wouldn’t be necessary at all. I’m looking for anyone’s thoughts on this. Thanks for you let time and feedback, I appreciate it!
Page 1 / 1
Two very different factors. Sub is non-directional, but adds huge impact. Surrounds are very directional, and add some impact plus ambiance, as well as directional queues. Personally, I'd go for surrounds before a Sub because I feel they add more for the $$$, but that's me.
Surround speakers aren’t “required” but they will produce a MUCH more immersive surround experience especially with 5.1 and Dolby Atmos audio. I have the Arc/Sub/Play:1s setup and it sounds fantastic with multichannel audio especially while watching films and listening to music in 5.1 surround. I would never go back to not having surround speakers.
I have the Arc and a Sub and was quite happy with it. I have several spare Play 1s but never set them up as surrounds as I couldn’t satisfy the spouse’s desire for invisibility. Still sounded pretty good.
We recently added a bookcase in the back corner of the (diamond shaped) TV room, gave me a chance to put the Play 1s on top of it and hide the cords behind. The surround placement is horrible, way too high at 7 feet and they are sitting on top of each other - but rotated 90 degrees so each points along a wall.
Sounds a lot batter than no surrounds. TruePlay made a nice difference!
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.