Skip to main content
Contributor I
May 17, 2017

The penny dropped

  • May 17, 2017
  • 15 replies
  • 635 views
Hi,

I have had the playbar and recently added the sub, now due to various circumstances beyond my control haven't had the chance to fully have these up and running but I have had a chance to test them out, and I was really pleased.

Naturally I was looking to add some play 1s to the mix and enjoy a proper 5.1. The penny dropped. Not in my case because I decided against purchasing them. See I was not aware that sonos does not offer true 5.1 at the time of purchasing. It was only when I decided to buy the 1s that I found out. Yes I can buy this TV, couple it with that bluray and use this switch and then I can make it work somehow. But isn't the whole point of having a sonos system, simplicity?

Having to have to change my whole media centre to accommodate sonos sounds anything but!! Having read on this topic I realised that sonos have a different idea to most people on home theatre and look quite set in their ways.

So it saddens me that I will have to give up wireless and the perceived simplicity of sonos for a traditional receiver and 5.1, or another Soundbar that decoders the codecs I need.

I don't mean to come on here and bash sonos especially on my first post. But I want my voice to be heard. If you guys just accept this, nothing will happen(I know it's been discussed for years) . Openly speak out and hopefully one day it will fall on ears that have been treated for ear wax.
    This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.

    15 replies

    May 19, 2017
    I already had an old but decently performing Yamaha/KEF 5.1 system
    There are just more boxes, cables and complexity than in a pure SONOS solution. I also suspect a PlayBase + SUB + 2 x PLAY:1s would sound better than my system.

    As long as your old 5.1 system also has .1 from a decent KEF sub, I do not think Sonos would sound better. More boxes and cables - no doubt.
    I am also pretty sure that for music, Connect + the Yamaha running in 2.1 stereo driving the relevant KEF speakers would do better than the referred Sonos components.
    pwt
    Virtuoso
    May 19, 2017
    As long as your old 5.1 system also has .1 from a decent KEF sub, I do not think Sonos would sound better. More boxes and cables - no doubt.
    I am also pretty sure that for music, Connect + the Yamaha running in 2.1 stereo driving the relevant KEF speakers would do better than the referred Sonos components.

    KEF KHT 2005.2 Speakers + HTB2SE Sub, so probably not bad, and quite enjoyable to listen to, but it's never really impressed me for music. A stereo pair of PLAY:5s sounds significantly better for that.
    4 x P:5 | Sub | 4 x P:1 | 3 x Connect | 2 x Boost | Connect:Amp | 2 x One | Amp | Move | Port | Era 300
    May 19, 2017
    A stereo pair of PLAY:5s sounds significantly better for that.
    Now that is a very different set up compared to a play base derived one, to which my comment applied - largely because the latter does not provide the stereo image obtained from a physically separated front left/right speaker combination. Which the 5 pair does, so it may well sound better than your HT set up, both being similar in layout.
    pwt
    Virtuoso
    May 19, 2017
    A stereo pair of PLAY:5s sounds significantly better for that.
    Now that is a very different set up compared to a play base derived one, to which my comment applied - largely because the latter does not provide the stereo image obtained from a physically separated front left/right speaker combination. Which the 5 pair does, so it may well sound better than your HT set up, both being similar in layout.


    Good point. I'm going to resist the temptation to buy a PLAYBASE for direct experimentation. SONOS has enough of my money for the time being :8
    4 x P:5 | Sub | 4 x P:1 | 3 x Connect | 2 x Boost | Connect:Amp | 2 x One | Amp | Move | Port | Era 300
    May 20, 2017
    Based on your signature, I'd have to agree with you!