Skip to main content
VintageAudio
Trending Lyricist I
June 10, 2019
Answered

Audio optical switch (not splitter) to feed Sonos or AV receiver

Greetings, first time poster.

I thought I had a simple solution to the lack of a headphone connection in my Sonos setup. And I was not interested in spending money on a Connect if I didn't need to.

Why not, I thought, have an optical audio switch in line before the signal goes to the Playbase? So the audio connection would be from TV into the switch, and the switch would have two optical audio outs. One would feed the Playbase, and the other could go to my AV receiver (which is no longer the main source of output now that I have my surround setup)(a Playbase, a pair of Play:3's and a Sub. The AV receiver is perfectly fine, just unused) With a switch in line, I could choose only the output I wanted.

My plan works great by manually unplugging from the Playbase, and then plugging into my AV receiver. I plug my headphones in to the AV unit, and I get my desired effect: headphone sound for me, and no output from the surround to wake up my wife. When I want to switch back to the surround, I unplug the optical audio cable from the AV unit and plug back into the Playbase.

Obviously, that's not a practical solution. Moving equipment around to get access, wear and tear on the end of the cable, etc. However, there doesn't seem to exist just an audio optical switch with 1 in and 2 out, or even a 1x3.

There's a ton of 3x1 switches (3 in, 1 out) and a ton of splitters. But splitting the signal means that both the surround system and the AV receiver would be outputting sound, not what I want.

I am really surprised that something as simple as this doesn't exist, or at least seem to.

Anybody else ever attempt to do this?

  • Jeff
This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.
Chris
ChrisAnswer
Lead Maestro
June 10, 2019
Here you go.

https://www.amazon.com/Neoteck-Digital-Converter-Optical-Bidirectional/dp/B07BWD1MBX/ref=sr_1_11?keywords=optical+pass+through+and+rca&qid=1560207462&s=electronics&sr=1-11

other alternative would be use HDMI-ARC out of TV if you have it and then get box that extract HDMI-ARC to toslink and rca.

https://www.amazon.com/Splitter-Optical-Toslink-Adapter-Converter/dp/B07MTXMMC5/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?keywords=hdmi+arc+to+optical&qid=1560207562&s=electronics&sr=1-1-spons&psc=1
Respect the Queue (2)Move (3)Beam (1) Era100 (2)ARC (1)SonosOne (1)Playbar (4)Play5 (4)Play1 (3)Play3 (1)Port (2)Connect (1) Roam (2) Ace (1)Connect:Amp (4)Sonos Amp (1)Sub + (9) Echo + Smartthings; (2)Play)

25 replies

VintageAudio
Trending Lyricist I
June 11, 2019

In a typical 1-to-3 splitter, a switch would have to allow for 7 combinations of active output ports. An unwarranted complexity.


That I would agree, if the switch was designed to handle multiple outputs at the same time.

The device I'm looking for would allow for a selection of a single output from multiple outputs. Just as a basic 3x1 switch works now, it allows for only 1 active input from multiple inputs. And truly, that is a switch, not a splitter.

So instead of having a switch on the front end (the 3x1) the switching would occur on the output side for a 1x3.

-Jeff
ratty
June 11, 2019
Find one then. If you still can't then it underscores the point that there's little or no demand for such a product.
VintageAudio
Trending Lyricist I
June 11, 2019
Find one then.

Lol, yeah, that's what I've been trying to do. And that's what brought me here. I was hoping someone else had run into the same issue as me.

If you still can't then it underscores the point that's there's little or no demand for such a product.


It appears to be that way. Regardless of the reason, a true, basic, 1x3 toslink switch doesn't exist. I still find that odd. *shrug*

I appreciate all the input, and I'll touch base after checking out the 1x3 splitter tonight.

-Jeff
Lyricist III
June 11, 2019
I think this has more switching capability than you need, but might serve the need:

https://jtechdigital.com/product/spdif-4x2/

The same company offers several other switch / splitter devices that might be of interest.

Good luck.

-Scott
VintageAudio
Trending Lyricist I
June 11, 2019
Scott, you eagle-eyed sonofagun!

That is the closest thing I've seen yet. And I just ordered it. What's funny is the splitter I was going to try also happens to be a J-Tech product.

This splitter/switch actually has the capabilities that ratty mentions above, being able to choose combinations of outs and ins.

Once I get it, I'll just use the one In, and feed it independently to each of the 2 Outs. The other ports will go unused, but hey, fine with me.

In this thread, I don't know who gets to choose best answer, but I recommend Scott's post.

Thanks again!

-Jeff
Chris
Lead Maestro
June 11, 2019
This switches the inputs not the outputs - all outputs function from what I see . From your info you had one input wanting 2 outputs. Don’t see where this solves where you want it to switch the outputs on and off individually.
Respect the Queue (2)Move (3)Beam (1) Era100 (2)ARC (1)SonosOne (1)Playbar (4)Play5 (4)Play1 (3)Play3 (1)Port (2)Connect (1) Roam (2) Ace (1)Connect:Amp (4)Sonos Amp (1)Sub + (9) Echo + Smartthings; (2)Play)
VintageAudio
Trending Lyricist I
June 11, 2019
As a side note, is there a way to edit the title of this thread I've started? I'd like to amend it.
Chris
Lead Maestro
June 11, 2019
We k looks like you could set one to an input that had nothing attached. But just turning down volume or muting would seem easier.
Respect the Queue (2)Move (3)Beam (1) Era100 (2)ARC (1)SonosOne (1)Playbar (4)Play5 (4)Play1 (3)Play3 (1)Port (2)Connect (1) Roam (2) Ace (1)Connect:Amp (4)Sonos Amp (1)Sub + (9) Echo + Smartthings; (2)Play)
VintageAudio
Trending Lyricist I
June 11, 2019
This switches the inputs not the outputs. From your info you had one input wanting 2 outputs. Don’t see where this solves where you want it to switch the outputs on and off individually.

If I understand this correctly, I can choose the input, but more importantly, the output as well:

(screen grab from the description)

ratty
June 11, 2019
just turning down volume or muting would seem easier.
Precisely. Why deal with the unnecessary complexity, and another remote, simply to turn a signal on and off.