Does anyone have thoughts about which of these combinations to choose? For music/audio, not TV.
Price is roughly the same, within £50.
Best answer by GuitarSuperstar
View original
This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.
Userlevel 6
+14
I feel it does add a bit more low end, but the 300s are excellent without. Like you say, you can add one later on
Thanks both. Very helpful. I prefer two to 2.1 on principle, so this confirms my thoughts. 👍
Userlevel 6
+14
Mind you, normal stereo also sounds fab!
Userlevel 6
+14
As
Userlevel 7
Thank you. Complete ignorance here, but is Dolby Atmos for music or only home cinema? What music sources would I need to play to get this enhancement?
In your situation, if you get a pair of Era 300s, you will only be able to play music in Dolby Atmos. You can play music in Dolby Atmos directly from the Sonos app with an Apple Music or Amazon Music Unlimited subscription.
Userlevel 6
+14
I would agree given you can then listen to Atmos via Apple or Amazon. I have 2 Era 300s for music and love them. I do have a sub mini with them mind you, but they are fine without
Thank you. Complete ignorance here, but is Dolby Atmos for music or only home cinema? What music sources would I need to play to get this enhancement?
Userlevel 7
I would go with the pair of Era 300s because they give you the option to listen to music in Dolby Atmos which sounds phenomenal on the speakers. And a pair of Era 300s produce a lot of bass even without a separate subwoofer.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.