Question

Why I'm returning / selling my brand new Sonos Play 1



Show first post
This topic has been closed for further comments. You can use the search bar to find a similar topic, or create a new one by clicking Create Topic at the top of the page.

122 replies

If you put your nose up to the grill, both PLAY:3 and PLAY:5 are stereo -- when horizontally oriented.

nathanielbennett456: SONOS has been UPnP since day one and 3rd party controllers (admittedly somewhat limited compared to the full featured SONOS controllers) emerged shortly after. SONOS is not, however, a DLNA device. If you like, you can call the SONOS controller App from within an iOS App.
If I recall right, the 3 goes into mono mode in vertical position.

Stereo imaging needs the left/right speakers and the listener to be in something like the corners of an equilateral triangle, and that dictates the limited and very near field stereo effect of these units.
Userlevel 1
Badge +4
I read a review of the play 5, and it quoted one of the sonos designers whom they had interviewed that the play 5 does have 2 channel audio, but it's pretty limited unless you put your face right in front of it!
Userlevel 7
Are you sure about a single play 3 and 5 being "natively stereo"? Only I got a different answer on another thread and from sonos. The 2.0 configuration is two of the players grouped as a stereo pair. .

There may be some misleading information here in the community and by Sonos regarding stereo imaging from a Single Play 3. However, Kumar's analysis is probably closer to what one may expect. FYI, this link (with information provided by Sonos) compares the Play 1, 3 and 5 as to expected imaging from a single speaker:

http://www.sonos.com/en-us/products/wireless-speakers/compare
The 3/5 are stereo in theory but in practice once you move just a few feet away from them, you are out of the sweet spot for stereo and they become point sources. The 5 will hold the stereo image further, but only a little further.
Userlevel 1
Badge +4
Are you sure about a single play 3 and 5 being "natively stereo"? Only I got a different answer on another thread and from sonos. The 2.0 configuration is two of the players grouped as a stereo pair. To the OP, the play 5 is sonically significantly superior over the 1if that helps you.
Userlevel 7
I know how it feels to spend good money on something that doesn't perform to expectations. EXPECTATIONS is the keyword in your analysis of the Play 1. IMO you didn't do your research and possibly let a sales person with limited knowledge oversell the Play 1 thereby inflating your EXPECTATIONS of its capability. That being said I believe your loathing of the Play 1 is very much misplaced and unwarranted.

For the record BT audio is a compressed codec. The Play 1 is capable of delivering sound quality equal to CD uncompressed audio. A BT speaker is not. That being said all speakers are not created equal. Just because a speaker will reproduce acoustics equal to a CD doesn't mean it will capture the FULL range (i.e. 20,000 khz - 20,000 kHz). Every speaker will have limitations on how well it performs in the High / Mid / Low ranges. That holds true for wired speakers as well.

The Sonos line of speakers are not studio monitors nor were they designed to be. Without going into a spec comparison take my word (as I have done my research) the Sonos line of speakers for the price point are among the best wireless speakers on the market. Are there better - IMO yes; but not by much and lack the ability for Zone setup.

You said that the Play 1 failed to accurately reproduce a 0:32 passage in a song you like. While I don't doubt what you say - I would ask are you able to hear the passage on any other SINGLE mono speaker. You are aware that a Single Play 1 is not stereo? Only the Play 3 and Play 5 are stereo natively. In order to hear stereo reproduction from a Play 1 you must have two setup in stereo pair. In that arrangement you may have heard the 0:32 passage you were listening for.

I hate I came across as a "Sonos Fanboy" but I didn't know how else to make my point in this reply. Yours was not a question; but a rant on how bad the Sonos Play 1 is. IMO you just made a poor buying decision without doing your homework. All may not be loss so I ask you to consider the following...

Before you return (or sell the Play 1) buy a second one and setup as a stereo pair and do a listening test on the song you mentioned. You may be pleasantly surprised with the outcome. This is assuming you can still buy another and be able to return them both if still not satisfied.

Good luck to find the speaker or speakers that meet your expectations 🆒
I still have to get a good answer to the question: If I was to take any of these high end speakers, and play them in a blind test against a 5 pair at instrument matched sound levels - obviously only as loud as the 5 can go without any distortion - could these speakers still be picked out and preferred in a way that is statistically conclusive to their being speakers that deliver better sound quality?

I get that with powerful enough amplification, they will go louder without distorting, and are therefore more suited to large rooms, but that then limits the preference to their use only to those with large enough spaces and to loud music devotees that have them. And to the bragging rights set of course.
I'm not sure if the OP has a duff unit or unrealistic expectations. But if he is looking for true audiophile sound he could put his refund towards something featured in this article. Of course, a wireless streamer and some amplification will also be needed.
https://www.cnet.com/news/top-10-ultimate-high-end-speakers/
Userlevel 5
Badge +11
Yes, my comment about a refund vs selling was that the speaker was 1 day old...why would you even consider selling when you could just return for full refund.
When reading about trueplay, nowhere did It suggests It requires an Apple smartphone or tablet to use the feature
From http://www.sonos.com/trueplay-speaker-tuning-software (arrived at via sonos.com->'What is Sonos'->'Trueplay'):
For your Sonos PLAY:1, PLAY:3 and PLAY:5.
Set up with iPhone, iPad and iPod touch only
Bluetooth is fine in automobiles. In the home, it simply has too many annoyances. WiFi, and particularly SonosNet, is vastly superior.
I will concede that there is merit in your arguments about incomplete information about what the play 1 cannot do - and Sonos may have not realised the kind of user profile that will buy a play 1 at its price point, as compared that which bought/buys its more expensive products, that tend to be bought after more research.

Good luck with getting the refund - I think the comment you refer to was based upon the fact that most places that sell Sonos have a liberal and easy returns/refund policy.
I'm quite certain Sonos would love for Trueplay to work with all devices. Unfortunately only the Apple devices have consistent microphones.
Yes I agree it was down to my lack of understanding, but I don't believe my lack of understanding is entirely my fault. When reading about trueplay, nowhere did It suggests It requires an Apple smartphone or tablet to use the feature. It was only when I discovered that the trueplay button described in the manual didn't exist within the app, when I went onto this forum and read about how one guy was complaining about when the feature was coming to android did I relies it was only for Apple Devices.

As for Bluetooth, I had been reading up about a myriad of different systems; most of them support Bluetooth some even NFC. I kinda took it as a given and I understand it's my fault for not reading up about it properly.

As for find my post conflicting, I'm unsure what you mean. What I meant was that I had bought it from a Currys store today, took it home, listened to it. Unhappy I'm either looking for a kind refund from either Sonos or Currys or if I can't get a refund, to sell it some via Gumtree or eBay.

P.S In the style of Apple products, the original box really does have no information apart from the barcode and color information. I also found the website is unhelpful in instructing what the device is and isn't compatible with.
My reference speakers are QUAD ESL-63's. For their size, price and capabilities, the Play:1s are simply unbeatable, IMO. The OP must be used to colored speakers, like Bose. The Play:1s are quite accurate above 70hz
I have five Play1s dotted around the house and the sonic performance for their size never ceases to amaze me.


I have four and I agree. Very early after buying my first copies, I did a test comparing them against Harbeth C7 speakers that confirmed my initial impression of how good they are, so either the OP is listening to something defective or smoking something I'd stay away from.
Userlevel 5
Badge +9
I have five Play1s dotted around the house and the sonic performance for their size never ceases to amaze me.

You do not really say in your post what source you are feeding to the speaker?
Userlevel 5
Badge +11
Just bought a Sonos Play 1 today...I'm getting my money back be it via a refund or private sale on a popular auction website.

I find the start and then end of the post conflicting. If you bought it today, why would selling it on an auction site be an option?
I think you have a duff speaker as I don't recognize your description of the audio quality, the rest of it is basically just down to your lack of understanding of what the system offers.
I agree. There is enough out there about the play 1 beyond just the subjective good opinion of many people with hifi kit exposure, that suggests duff speaker in this case. And that can be said with even more conviction if your conclusion is after Trueplay tuning.
It is perfectly ok to return the product if it does not meet all your expectations, even misguided ones. If that wasn't the case, I would have suggested exchanging the unit for another new play 1.
I think you have a duff speaker as I don't recognize your description of the audio quality, the rest of it is basically just down to your lack of understanding of what the system offers. I don't know what "atomically customisable" means but Trueplay is not user adjustable, it does its thing and that's it, you either leave it on or you turn it off, there are no extra user adjustments that can be made to it on that front. Additionally Sonos does NOT support upnp, so your understanding is just completely wrong there. As for "I expected it to have Bluetooth", maybe you should have done some basic research? Your erroneous assumptions do not make it a bad product, it just doesn't make it the right product for what you want to use it for but it is the right product for many people.

Every criticism you have made is down to the fact that you didn't research the product properly. Sonos have never claimed any of the features that you believe it should have, so accusing them of lying is just idiocy. It's blindingly obvious that the system doesn't support Bluetooth for the simple reason that Bluetooth is not mentioned anywhere on the packaging, website or advertising blurb, so why would you assume it is? Similarly there's no mention of being "highly customisable", this is just another fantasy you've concocted out of nowhere and are now pissed off at yourself for getting so completely wrong, so just take it back for a refund and buy a Bluetooth speaker, which is what you wanted in the first place.
Userlevel 1
Badge +4
Your opinion on SQ is valid, as only you can judge how us feel it sounds. Your other points just appear to be a lack of research before buying. Seriously though, what did you expect for £150?