Hi
I have a couple of speakers that mean I have to use S1 controller app, can the new Roam be used with this or is it only S2 compatible
Hi
I have a couple of speakers that mean I have to use S1 controller app, can the new Roam be used with this or is it only S2 compatible
Yes, I’m refusing to pay more money for exactly the same level of service so I can spend more money to buy more of their kit.
As it stands, I’ll replace my TV rig with a dedicated TV set up when the time comes, my music setup - getting replaced with a dedicated Amp/Speakers that don’t obsolete - wired they may be, but so be it.
So your posting in the “Is Roam S1 Compatible?” thread is really just a rehashed whinge from the “End of Software Support” thread you last posted in. Got it.
A device needs to be connected directly to the router right? Which is the solution Support gave me for my connectivity issues several years ago. So I either replace the bridge (spend more money unnecessarily) or plug a speaker in directly (a complete waste of a speaker given the location). So….
So . . . for the price of a Boost, you are crippling your use of all your other devices, and also eliminating the ability to purchase a new device which you seem to like if it weren’t S2 only?
Makes me think of a nose, spite, and a face.
Also, what other manufacturer are you moving to that has eliminated the possibility that in 12-15 years after launch, they would have to split the line? Be careful what you answer, for some well known speakers makers are known for far more egregious moves than when their lineup can’t keep up with growing technology. We are talking eliminating an entire line of speakers that were sold right up to the day they were abandoned, and coming out with an entirely new line which is incompatible with the old.
Yes, I’m refusing to pay more money for exactly the same level of service so I can spend more money to buy more of their kit.
As it stands, I’ll replace my TV rig with a dedicated TV set up when the time comes, my music setup - getting replaced with a dedicated Amp/Speakers that don’t obsolete - wired they may be, but so be it.
A device needs to be connected directly to the router right? Which is the solution Support gave me for my connectivity issues several years ago. So I either replace the bridge (spend more money unnecessarily) or plug a speaker in directly (a complete waste of a speaker given the location). So….
So . . . for the price of a Boost, you are crippling your use of all your other devices, and also eliminating the ability to purchase a new device which you seem to like if it weren’t S2 only?
Makes me think of a nose, spite, and a face.
Also, what other manufacturer are you moving to that has eliminated the possibility that in 12-15 years after launch, they would have to split the line? Be careful what you answer, for some well known speakers makers are known for far more egregious moves than Sonos’ when their lineup can’t keep up with growing technology. We are talking eliminating an entire line of speakers that were sold right up to the day they were abandoned, and coming out with an entirely new line which is incompatible with the old.
Travelling on vacation in a couple of weeks. Shopping for a new travel speaker. I looked at the Roam, but as I’m still on S1 due to my refusal to upgrade (only my bridge would die) because I refuse to go back to the problematic wi-fi issues I had before I moved to Sonosnet, and I also cannot have a speaker jacked directly in to my router. So the Roam is a no go for me. Same applies really for the soundbar upgrade I’m looking at.
I was disappointed when Sonos split the tech stack and remain so. Still, it’s been the kick up the arse I needed to move away from one manufacturer.
What makes you think upgrading to S2 means you can’t use Sonosnet?
A device needs to be connected directly to the router right? Which is the solution Support gave me for my connectivity issues several years ago. So I either replace the bridge (spend more money unnecessarily) or plug a speaker in directly (a complete waste of a speaker given the location). So….
Travelling on vacation in a couple of weeks. Shopping for a new travel speaker. I looked at the Roam, but as I’m still on S1 due to my refusal to upgrade (only my bridge would die) because I refuse to go back to the problematic wi-fi issues I had before I moved to Sonosnet, and I also cannot have a speaker jacked directly in to my router. So the Roam is a no go for me. Same applies really for the soundbar upgrade I’m looking at.
I was disappointed when Sonos split the tech stack and remain so. Still, it’s been the kick up the arse I needed to move away from one manufacturer.
What makes you think upgrading to S2 means you can’t use Sonosnet?
Travelling on vacation in a couple of weeks. Shopping for a new travel speaker. I looked at the Roam, but as I’m still on S1 due to my refusal to upgrade (only my bridge would die) because I refuse to go back to the problematic wi-fi issues I had before I moved to Sonosnet, and I also cannot have a speaker jacked directly in to my router. So the Roam is a no go for me. Same applies really for the soundbar upgrade I’m looking at.
I was disappointed when Sonos split the tech stack and remain so. Still, it’s been the kick up the arse I needed to move away from one manufacturer.
Major blunder by Sonos. Very frustrating for a very loyal customer. S2 has been frustrating. This is likely my breaking point.
It's not a blunder, it simply cannot be done.
Is it OK if I challenge this assumption, at least a little bit?
If Sonos was indeed concerned about their stock market price falling, wouldn’t they have completely abandon S1 as a concept, and force everyone to purchase new speakers? That would have surely generated much more revenue, supporting the stock price, if there was no longer any function for older speakers at all, and everyone was forced in to purchasing S2 capable speakers.
I would think continuing to support S1 systems is counter profit oriented thinking. But I’m not a market analyst, just a user on a forum.
Don’t forget, this is exactly what they tried to do. Initially, they came out and said that we with older equipment had to brick the equipment and then we would get 30% off of the new equipment. It was only when we all blew a fuse that they relented, and came up with this bogus S1/S2 idea. I have a lot of original Sonos gear 5 Play:5’s, a few Play:3’s and Play:1’s, a sound bar, and amps and connects. I can only use S1 for all my equipment, therefore I will not buy any new gear that requires S2. I have invested thousand in Sonos, but I will not buy any additional Sonos gear. When they finally drop support of S1, which I fully expect to happen, I will replace with other equipment. You can accomplish much of what you get from Sonos with other equipment these days, and for a lot less money.
Also, Sonos makes excellent hardware, but their software (apps) suck.
In addition, at some point, Sonos will come out with an S3 option, and pull this bogus concept again. I think many people who invested in S2 equipment will feel the same way we feel when this happens to them.
The s1 s2 gap stops me buying any more sonos... I have ten sonos components. Three only work with s1.
I cancelled my roam order as s2 only. Sonos driver to a non customer....as To replace 2 connects and 1 p5 would could me around £1200 for a £140 roam. So in short as a big time sonos customer I can not longer add new products to my system and spend money with sonos. so essentially now am no longer a sonos customer because sonos make it impossible with spending 1000s to get as is function I already have. Suggest you review....
Major blunder by Sonos. Very frustrating for a very loyal customer. S2 has been frustrating. This is likely my breaking point.
The s1 s2 gap stops me buying any more sonos... I have ten sonos components. Three only work with s1.
I cancelled my roam order as s2 only. Sonos driver to a non customer....as To replace 2 connects and 1 p5 would could me around £1200 for a £140 roam. So in short as a big time sonos customer I can not longer add new products to my system and spend money with sonos. so essentially now am no longer a sonos customer because sonos make it impossible with spending 1000s to get as is function I already have. Suggest you review....
Exactly what do you expect them to do? S1 only components do not have enough memory and/or storage to run S2, and S2 only components need S2 in order to run their new features, they simply cannot run S1. There is nothing that can be done.
That's a cop out. There is plenty of “old” software in the computer world that will run on new hardware. Maybe some of us that have thousands of dollars invested are willing to forego any new features. It's very sad that Sonos has decided to abandon their oldest and most loyal customers.
Melodramatic, ill-informed nonsense
The s1 s2 gap stops me buying any more sonos... I have ten sonos components. Three only work with s1.
I cancelled my roam order as s2 only. Sonos driver to a non customer....as To replace 2 connects and 1 p5 would could me around £1200 for a £140 roam. So in short as a big time sonos customer I can not longer add new products to my system and spend money with sonos. so essentially now am no longer a sonos customer because sonos make it impossible with spending 1000s to get as is function I already have. Suggest you review....
Exactly what do you expect them to do? S1 only components do not have enough memory and/or storage to run S2, and S2 only components need S2 in order to run their new features, they simply cannot run S1. There is nothing that can be done.
That's a cop out. There is plenty of “old” software in the computer world that will run on new hardware. Maybe some of us that have thousands of dollars invested are willing to forego any new features. It's very sad that Sonos has decided to abandon their oldest and most loyal customers.
Thanks, I will check into that. I have a Move and it works great (as designed) on my S1 network. That's why I wish the Roam had been designed the same way.
But then it would have had to be a small Move, lacking the additional features that the Roam actually has. The Roam CANNOT be S1 compatible. The whole point of the S1 / S2 split was to lose the restrictions of the older devices. Roam on S1? An impossible and self-contradictory request.
Thanks, I will check into that. I have a Move and it works great (as designed) on my S1 network. That's why I wish the Roam had been designed the same way.
It’s perfectly acceptable to have that desire. Many do. The part I am calling foul on is the assumption that because melvimbe has an alternate opinion, he must be a Sonos employee.
You may want to look at third party controllers. I’ve read that there may be the option to simultaneously run S1 and S2 products, but I don’t have any personal experience. However, neither the Roam nor Move will ever operate on S1, the operating system doesn’t have the ability to recognize those devices.
I do concur with melvimbe that it would be highly unlikely to be an intelligent thing for Sonos to officially support running S1 on either device. The challenges outweigh any potential benefits, especially for a vanishingly small population. Sonos will likely continue to prioritize their software choices for the masses, not the individual corner cases.
Bruce,
I get his analysis... I just wish Sonos had opted to let this new small portable be available for all users, S1 and S2. I will look into how the experience would be having both an S1 and S2 operate in your house.
Why is it that if someone disagrees with your perspective, they must be a Sonos employee?
I’m pretty sure that Sonos employees are required by the company to have ‘Sonos employee’ on their account, much like all the moderators do. I also feel fairly confident in saying that not only is melvimbe not a Sonos employee, but that his analysis is correct.
Hi
I have a couple of speakers that mean I have to use S1 controller app, can the new Roam be used with this or is it only S2 compatible
The best bet (IMO) if you want to stick with S1 for a while, is just use any good blue-tooth speaker with Spotify or Amazon. It won’t be integrated with your S1 system, but it will save you thousands of dollars.
The S1/S2 debacle has been debated ad nauseam, but I can’t help think there was an opportunity here for Sonos to simply ensure compatibility between the two controllers. They did it with the Move and if the S1 system is supposedly legacy, then what’s the harm in ensuring that a new device with supposedly “better specs” is capable of supporting the old software? It’s not like we’re trying to do the reverse here.
The bolded part is incorrect. The Move was released before the S1/S2 split, and Sonos did not do anything at all to make the Move S1 compatible. What’s the harm of making the Roam S1 compatible? First the S1 customer base is surely much smaller than the S2 customer base. Second, making it S1 compatible would add cost to development and testing, since it would be two systems, 2 sets of features to test. Having 2 sets of features also would confusing, as you’d likely end up with customers who believed they could do speaker swaps, or share bluetooth audio with other speakers….only to find out it’s an S2 only feature. And then you would have all the angry customers who upgraded to S2 because they were told there were no new S1 products. And of course, Sonos obviously would more people switch over to S2, both to lower support costs and experience the better S2 features….and that doesn’t happen as fast if they keep making S1 products.
You must work for Sonos. Making the Roam on the same platform as the Move would have been a great fit and service for this low end/cost speaker.
The s1 s2 gap stops me buying any more sonos... I have ten sonos components. Three only work with s1.
I cancelled my roam order as s2 only. Sonos driver to a non customer....as To replace 2 connects and 1 p5 would could me around £1200 for a £140 roam. So in short as a big time sonos customer I can not longer add new products to my system and spend money with sonos. so essentially now am no longer a sonos customer because sonos make it impossible with spending 1000s to get as is function I already have. Suggest you review....
Exactly what do you expect them to do? S1 only components do not have enough memory and/or storage to run S2, and S2 only components need S2 in order to run their new features, they simply cannot run S1. There is nothing that can be done.
That is complete rubbish that they had to make the Roam S2 only because of memory. They could and should have made it S1/S2 compatible. They didn’t make it S1 compatible to force us to upgrade… all for a little portable speaker. Very upsetting and sad they have turned into this….
Brought one Home from the store Yesterday. My setup is $80pct S2 and $20pct S1.
Today I returned it.
Is it OK if I challenge this assumption, at least a little bit?
Of course Bruce! But you aren’t going to persuade the OP by reason and sense, he and they have clearly parted company. I just thought it not worth the effort.
Is it OK if I challenge this assumption, at least a little bit?
If Sonos was indeed concerned about their stock market price falling, wouldn’t they have completely abandon S1 as a concept, and force everyone to purchase new speakers? That would have surely generated much more revenue, supporting the stock price, if there was no longer any function for older speakers at all, and everyone was forced in to purchasing S2 capable speakers.
I would think continuing to support S1 systems is counter profit oriented thinking. But I’m not a market analyst, just a user on a forum.
Ridiculous! No company (*cough* Bose *cough*) is going to abandon an entire current lineup of products (*cough* Bose SoundTouch *cough*) and come out with a brand new lineup (*cough* Bose Smart Speaker *cough*) that is completely incompatible with the old one. Simply ridiculous!
Is it OK if I challenge this assumption, at least a little bit?
If Sonos was indeed concerned about their stock market price falling, wouldn’t they have completely abandon S1 as a concept, and force everyone to purchase new speakers? That would have surely generated much more revenue, supporting the stock price, if there was no longer any function for older speakers at all, and everyone was forced in to purchasing S2 capable speakers.
I would think continuing to support S1 systems is counter profit oriented thinking. But I’m not a market analyst, just a user on a forum.
The Roam is only possible because Sonos development is no longer restricted by its oldest devices.
Total rubbish. It's because Sonos is worried about stock market price falling if users don't replace the components they've spent loads on. It is straight forward to allow S1 components to run on S2 controller. Sonos chose not to allow this.
Well you seem to be an expert on Sonos technical matters as well as on their company strategy (with reference to the thread you have just started).
Thank you for sharing your expertise with everyone. I hope nobody is so foolish as to challenge your assertions.
The Roam is only possible because Sonos development is no longer restricted by its oldest devices.
Total rubbish. It's because Sonos is worried about stock market price falling if users don't replace the components they've spent loads on. It is straight forward to allow S1 components to run on S2 controller. Sonos chose not to allow this.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.