When i purchased these speakers i did so in the knowledge that i could play my own music from them without the need to pay for an additional streaming service just to listen to playlists that spotify or amazon create! These devices were advertised and sold on the strength of being able to play music from IOS devices. It even says on the box Made for iPod iPhone and iPad. I have clearly been mis-sold these items. How can this be ethical or even good business practice! If we have any lawyers in the community can we take out a class action for all the customers that have been mis-sold sonos products? Would we all be eligible to return these products for a refund? I have spent the last eight years advising all my friends and family to buy Sonos........That ended when they removed this feature. You have just lost 18 customers today and that is just my family. Not happy and soon to be not a Sonos customer.
speaking, as I understand it, according to the EULA you agreed with you did not have a knowledge you could use Sonos as you did, but an expectation.
As there are alternatives out there (your Beams already support AirPlay 2).
https://en.community.sonos.com/announcements-228985/on-this-iphone-or-ipad-no-longer-available-6829000
Of course I cannot be sure what your best option would be and I am not attempting to advise. GPM is certainly worth considering.
As to actual pricing on eBay, a used Play:1 goes for $75-80, a new in the box is as low as $112. ~70% return for a used product is not bad, despite all the "devaluation" going on. I suggest you take advantage of these prices and sell your Sonos, because despite the gnashing of teeth, the "On this iDevice" feature is not coming back.
I suspect your right with the "on this device" feature but Sonos would not be the first company to listen to their customers and make changes in retrospect.
Thanks for the info. Streaming would be great if i had a stable internet that did not go down all the time.
So why not buy a NAS and store your music there? Your family can then set up their own playlists with no dependence on an internet connection.
Or buy a <$20 thumb drive and stick it in the USB slot that most consumer routers have nowadays. Even cheaper than a NAS. The fact is, with little to no output in money and/or time, the "On this iPhone" functionality can be replicated by alternatives that give far more functionality and reliability for the user. Those who do not take advantage of these alternatives are only refusing because it would dilute their outrage; outrage they are hoping will force Sonos to reverse their decision.
Yes and?
It doesn't specifically say "made to play the music stored on an iOS device"?
When i purchased these speakers i did so in the knowledge that i could play my own music from them without the need to pay for an additional streaming service just to listen to playlists that spotify or amazon create! These devices were advertised and sold on the strength of being able to play music from IOS devices. It even says on the box Made for iPod iPhone and iPad. I have clearly been mis-sold these items. How can this be ethical or even good business practice! If we have any lawyers in the community can we take out a class action for all the customers that have been mis-sold sonos products? Would we all be eligible to return these products for a refund? I have spent the last eight years advising all my friends and family to buy Sonos........That ended when they removed this feature. You have just lost 18 customers today and that is just my family. Not happy and soon to be not a Sonos customer.
more to the point I wont be investing in any more sonos equipment.
Well, I just found i can't play songs from my iPhone today.. i agree with everyone regarding losing this ability. thats what made the Sonos so appealing in the first place, simplicity, ease of use and being able to play off my library on my phone. Not to go have to set up a NAS, move the music to the computer, subscribe to a service. It was great to play from your phone, simple and easy. I have 2 play 1’s, a play bar and the sub in my great room. Its setup there for ease of use for everyone, including guests to play their music. I was about to buy 2 of the Play Ones or whatever they are called now but not a chance. 1,500 in speakers already invested and go spend another 400 and have them take away stuff again. Not. Did i mention how my playbar is useless now for use with my TV due to the 3rd world engineering job they did on the optical in port cover? I’ve moved my playbar 3 times, the 2 cent optical in port cover broke and now the optical cable from the TV won't stay in place. You can't just replace the piece its all part of the playbar. So now i can't listen to surround sound for my TV which is another reason i bought Sonos. Unless I buy a new play bar. They so graciously offered to sell me a new one for 450 and pay for the shipping. When I look at the optical in on my old 2003/2004 Denon AVR 3803 with optical in ports they have an outer sleeve in the port housing to hold the optical in cable firmly in place. Sonos was a great idea in its time but they got fat heads and arrogant. Now there are so many other choices and with better sound quality too.
Welcome to the forum and Happy Christmas.
Hey Solved the issue and sold the sonos equipment…..Merry Xmas!!
Hey Solved the issue and sold the sonos equipment…..Merry Xmas!!
Great. What did you get to replace it?
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.