https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/sonos-laying-off-100-people-amid-expensive-app-problems/
Oh and bring back SMBv1 support so we can all access our music as we had done perfectly well for at least the last 10 years...please.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/08/sonos-laying-off-100-people-amid-expensive-app-problems/
Oh and bring back SMBv1 support so we can all access our music as we had done perfectly well for at least the last 10 years...please.
Not everyone is in the same situation and some may prefer to keep their library local rather than relying on streaming for everything or even paying monthly fees because of the size of their library.
Why don’t they just die, think Spence/Sonos.
I remember that line from some movie
Perhaps also the “eat cake if you can’t get bread” line?!
No modern NAS manufacturer will want to sell a product which is open season for malware that makes it into a users computer or sell with a big disclaimer stating “only store X types of files on our product”
I’m not really talking about new NAS drives, then only supporting more secure levels is fine.
As I said, if you educate people to only keep their music/video on an old NAS using SMB1, then in the home, there’s little actual risk to the user, like
For the sharing from a Mac/PC crowd, Sonos could and should have updated their desktop wizards to setup the ‘shares’ correctly. Instead they took the worst option of just removing support in the speaker firmware but leaving the now broken wizards in the (since updated) desktop apps for users to repeatedly attempt to ‘fix’ their issue without success. It’s hardly the best way to approach it.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.