S1 controller unable to add linkstation NAS with error: Reason: The Computer "SONOSZP80_1TB" cannot be found
Hardware/Software: Windows 11 with all updates installed, S1 controller, Sonos ZP80, Buffalo Linkstation live 1TB NAS
Network Profile Type: Private (VPN via high-speed Wi-Fi - No ethernet access to router)
Connectivity: ZP80 connects to my VPN via Wi-Fi and the two ports from the ZP80 run ethernet cables to a desktop mini and NAS
I was able to play music from my NAS, with the above connectivity till about Sept/Oct 2022, when a windows 11 update caused the NAS to disappear. This has now been fixed and I'm once again able to see my ancient 2010 Buffalo Linkstation Live (LS-CHL-V2 series) NAS.
Advanced sharing settings and SMB settings under windows features have all been checked by Sonos and all look fine and I’ve also posted screen grabs below.
When I try and add my NAS share in the S1 Controller I get the following error:
S1 -> Manage tab -> Music Library Settings -> Add -> Networked device -> Browse and select NAS and share from Network tab -> OK -> Next > admin/password -> Error message is - Reason: The Computer "SONOSZP80_1TB" cannot be found
If I manually add the NAS via IP I get the error:
Reason: The Computer "169.XXX.XXX.28" is not responding
Hopefully the screenshots will be more descriptive than the text above:
1) The SONOSZP80_1TB NAS and the ShareSonosZP share are detected by the Sonos S1 app as shown below:
2) NAS added via previous screen
3) Why am I getting the following error when the NAS is detected by S1?
4) Via IP address of NAS the error message is different!
Windows 11 firewall settings
Wi Fi is a private network
5) Another thing I noticed, after being able to access the NAS again is that the S1 controller has two entries for Windows Media (xxxx@outlook.com) even though I’ve removed the NAS library. Previously the NAS was not Windows Media. I’m tempted to do a clean install of S1 to resolve this particular issue. Or maybe the two rogue entries will disappear when I add the NAS and update the music library? Any thoughts would be most welcome on this front.
Mod edit: removed case number
Page 1 / 2
@lab1301,
If the DHCP server isn’t continually working and keeps stopping/timing out, can’t you just simply set a manual IP address, subnet mask, gateway and DNS on the NAS in its configuration page, might that perhaps work for you?
A 169.254.xxx.xxx IP address is intended to be a rescue space -- similar to telling the kids to go to …] in case of a large emergency (such as a major flood), phones aren’t working, etc. and then wait for adult supervision.
Hi @Belly M
You are correct - I forgot about that detail!
There probably is a way to bridge the connections on the PC, but I sure don’t know what it is.
@lab1301, I think it might be best to just buy a router that will provide you with your own subnet. Some routers do allow you to use another WiFi for internet access, while still creating a subnet for you.
Sometime yesterday I posted the following:
June to September, I bridged the WiFi with the ethernet adapter and that was when I was last able to use the NAS with Sonos. Now when I try and create a network bridge I get “The network bridge doesn't have a valid IP configuration" and I lose all internet connectivity and the S1.
You bridge two networks by highlighting the two adapters, right clicking and selecting the bridge option.
And the bridge is created as below:
But unlike in September, the problem is the DHCP server is timing out and that means there is no internet connectivity on the bridge. My laptop has a valid IP and so has the ZP80 as I’m streaming radio but for some reason the NAS, connected via ethernet to my windows 11 mini, is not getting a valid IP.
C:\Windows\System32>ipconfig /renew
Windows IP Configuration
No operation can be performed on Local Area Connection* 1 while it has its media disconnected. No operation can be performed on Local Area Connection* 12 while it has its media disconnected. An error occurred while renewing interface Ethernet : unable to contact your DHCP server. Request has timed out.
There probably is a way to bridge the connections on the PC, but I sure don’t know what it is.
@lab1301, I think it might be best to just buy a router that will provide you with your own subnet. Some routers do allow you to use another WiFi for internet access, while still creating a subnet for you.
The OP has stated he has no physical access to the Router’s Ethernet ports which is a requirement to get the NAS working correctly.
In the current config the PC would need to be a DHCP server and some form of bridge or network sharing enabled. As it stands the the Wi-Fi card in the PC does not pass anything to the Ethernet NIC. The ZP80 has no means of routing IP back to the NAS but the PC can see the devices on the Ethernet interface due to self assigned IP addressing.
Edit, I have not done any routing on a desktop PC between interfaces for about 25 years. There must have been something configured to enable this before the updates but in all honesty as @Corry P says it’s unsupported.
Hi @lab1301
NAS is connected via ethernet cable to ZP80. Second port from ZP80 is connected via cable to PC. If the DHCP server on the router is enabled, then, I would be able to bridge the ethernet and Wi Fi adapters.
I was about to look at your diagnostics when I saw this.
I agree, in part, with @Belly M - we don’t recommend you connect your NAS to a Sonos device, but it should work without issue (a Sonos device with 2 ethernet ports will act as a switch, in part). However, connecting a Sonos device to a PC via ethernet is a definite no-no.
Rather than create a bridge between WiFi and ethernet on the PC, however, I recommend you simply do not wire Sonos to your PC with an ethernet cable - both Sonos and the NAS should have their own ethernet connections directly (or via a switch) to the router. If, after doing this, you still have access issues, by all means please submit another diagnostic and I’ll take a look for you, but with the current, unsupported configuration, there’s not much point in me doing so - it’s not actually expected to work.
If the NAS stores nothing but music, connecting it to a router-connected Sonos device is acceptable. I still don’t recommend it though. If you have, for example, movies stored there too, please connect it directly to the router.
This does explain why you have a 169 IP address though - the DHCP server on the router has no idea the NAS drive exists. The PC is an effective firewall.
all becomes clear… but it’s totally the incorrect way.
The ZP80 needs to connect to the Router by Ethernet and NOT the PC (NAS can then stay connected to the ZP80) BUT you have said no Ethernet connection available.
You need to know how to create a bridge between the Wi-Fi card and the Ethernet card in the PC.
Just to reiterate what Corry is saying a 169….. network address gets assigned by the device itself when it cannot reach a DHCP server, this needs to be fixed as in its current state is not fully routable without having the gateway and DNS entries.
Thanks Belly M. This could indeed be a routing issue caused by the NAS not being able to obtain a valid IP from the router DHCP server. But having said that the NAS is on the local network and I’m able to log into it from windows. S1 controller also sees the NAS share and allows me to select the relevant share but then encounters the error. I’m able to ping the NAS and arp also lists it.
C:\Windows\System32>arp -a
Interface: 169.254.225.160 --- 0x9 Internet Address Physical Address Type 169.254.124.28 00-XX-XX-XX-XX-cc dynamic 169.254.255.255 ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff static
The connectivity is as follows
NAS is connected via ethernet cable to ZP80. Second port from ZP80 is connected via cable to PC. If the DHCP server on the router is enabled, then, I would be able to bridge the ethernet and Wi Fi adapters.
Just to reiterate what Corry is saying a 169….. network address gets assigned by the device itself when it cannot reach a DHCP server, this needs to be fixed as in its current state is not fully routable without having the gateway and DNS entries.
As the NAS is wired to the LAN. might it just be a faulty Ethernet connection? Maybe wire PC/laptop to the LAN using the same cable and see if that acquires an IP address from the router, just to check the cable is okay.
Just to reiterate what Corry is saying a 169….. network address gets assigned by the device itself when it cannot reach a DHCP server, this needs to be fixed as in its current state is not fully routable without having the gateway and DNS entries.
If the cable was faulty then it is unlikely that you will be able to see the NAS from the S1 app or WINDOWS. There is no internet connection via the ethernet adapter but all the devices that I want to access are on a local wired network. The NAS is accessible from WINDOWS and the S1 controller. If the DHCP server is fixed on the router, then, I would be able to bridge the Wi Fi and Ethernet adapters and there would be an internet connection via the ethernet adapter as well but I can’t see that making a difference to this problem unless I’m missing something.
@lab1301,
Looking at the left panel in your screenshot, it looks to me like you ‘may’ have a DHCP server running on the NAS (if I’m reading it correctly?) - if that is the case, you need to disable that server within the NAS configuration, let it use the routers DHCP server to acquire its network connection.
The settings screenshot is as below. I’ve just responded to Corry P with more information on how I tried changing the IP here and ended up losing access to teh NAS.
Hi @lab1301
There might be something useful in the logs - please submit a support diagnostic and reply here with the number given, and I’ll take a look. The problem is that they will probably tell us that a connection could not be made, but not why. It is worth checking, however.
Diagnostics submitted as per screenshot below 977543576. I tried adding the NAS share just before submitting the diagnostics just in case…
Also, I tried disabling DHCP on the NAS and manually entered the following as shown in the screenshot but the NAS was not accessible after the change. If you can spot what I did wrong do please let me know. It is rather easy to recover the NAS by restoring the settings back to default.
Same subnet mask and gateway as the PC as detailed just above:
Just to reiterate what Corry is saying a 169….. network address gets assigned by the device itself when it cannot reach a DHCP server, this needs to be fixed as in its current state is not fully routable without having the gateway and DNS entries.
As the NAS is wired to the LAN. might it just be a faulty Ethernet connection? Maybe wire PC/laptop to the LAN using the same cable and see if that acquires an IP address from the router, just to check the cable is okay.
Just to reiterate what Corry is saying a 169….. network address gets assigned by the device itself when it cannot reach a DHCP server, this needs to be fixed as in its current state is not fully routable without having the gateway and DNS entries.
Hi @lab1301
There might be something useful in the logs - please submit a support diagnostic and reply here with the number given, and I’ll take a look. The problem is that they will probably tell us that a connection could not be made, but not why. It is worth checking, however.
Hi @lab1301
I have no idea why I didn’t see that in the screenshot, considering I was looking at the line directly underneath it. It sounds like it is the DHCP server that needs to be reconfigured - note there’s no DNS servers listed, or a gateway.
I think I may have misinterpreted exactly what a 169 IP address means, but I am still suspicious of it. 169 addresses will not connect to the internet - only to local addresses - so, in theory, the Sonos devices should be able to connect.
Are you able to successfully ping 169.254.124.28?
Yes, I’m able to ping the NAS.
If you look at my very first post, there is a screenshot of where the S1 does see my NAS and displays the share ShareSonosZP and the folders in the share. But I get the error shown in the initial post when I try and add the share. But I’ve posted a fresh set of screenshots below. I was hoping that there would be a Sonos log somewhere that would give more details on the failure.
C:\Users\lab1301>ping 169.254.124.28
Pinging 169.254.124.28 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 169.254.124.28: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 169.254.124.28: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 169.254.124.28: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 169.254.124.28: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 169.254.124.28: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
I enter the NAS login details here (admin/password)
@lab1301,
Looking at the left panel in your screenshot, it looks to me like you ‘may’ have a DHCP server running on the NAS (if I’m reading it correctly?) - if that is the case, you need to disable that server within the NAS configuration, let it use the routers DHCP server to acquire its network connection.
Hi @lab1301
I have no idea why I didn’t see that in the screenshot, considering I was looking at the line directly underneath it. It sounds like it is the DHCP server that needs to be reconfigured - note there’s no DNS servers listed, or a gateway.
I think I may have misinterpreted exactly what a 169 IP address means, but I am still suspicious of it. 169 addresses will not connect to the internet - only to local addresses - so, in theory, the Sonos devices should be able to connect.
Are you able to successfully ping 169.254.124.28?
Has the 169 address been set as a static address on the NAS device (rather than reserved in the router)?
(That may be the same question as @Corry P ‘s final question)
The 169.254 address is called an APIPA address. It means the NAS/device cannot connect to the router. Basically, the device was unable to obtain an IP address from the router's DHCP server.
The router here is communal and non of the residents have access to it. The only connectivity I have is via highspeed Wi Fi. If I want ethernet connectivity, then, I will need to bridge the Wi Fi and ethernet adapters to create a network bridge. Will update this post when I hear back from the network guys with regards to the DHCP server on the router.
Hi @lab1301
I still think the fact that the NAS has an IP address starting with 169 is an issue, though I confess I do not understand why you are able to connect to the NAS’s configuration web portal via your browser.
Do you have manual IPv4 configuration on the NAS, or are you using Automatic (DHCP)? If your NAS’s IP doesn’t match 172.17.5.X, Sonos will not be able to connect to it.
WINDOWS: Windows 11, version 22H2
Hi Corry,
DHCP is enabled on the NAS as per screenshot below. I also think that this is something to do with the DHCP server on the router and I’ve emailed the network team.
June to September, I bridged the WiFi with the ethernet adapter and that was when I was last able to use the NAS with Sonos. Now when I try and create a network bridge I get The network bridge doesn't have a valid IP configuration and I lose all internet connectivity and the S1.
Oh and very strangely, I had to re-login into S1 and re-register my Sonos products late last night and this was when I was investigating/testing the network bridge issue but all that was resolved before I went to bed.
If I hear back from the network team, I’ll update the post.
Has the 169 address been set as a static address on the NAS device (rather than reserved in the router)?
(That may be the same question as @Corry P ‘s final question)
Hi @lab1301
I still think the fact that the NAS has an IP address starting with 169 is an issue, though I confess I do not understand why you are able to connect to the NAS’s configuration web portal via your browser.
Do you have manual IPv4 configuration on the NAS, or are you using Automatic (DHCP)? If your NAS’s IP doesn’t match 172.17.5.X, Sonos will not be able to connect to it.
Sigh. Thanks, Apple, for erasing three paragraphs of commentary. I’ll try to summarize, but fair warning, the page numbers may be off by one or two pages.
First, this manual is old, and likely written before there were multiple versions of SMB to choose from. Id be tempted to contact Buffalo’s CS group for more information on exactly where you can set which version of SMB is in use.
There are a couple of pages (148, 156 I think) where there is further discussion about SMB, although the latter is if you’ve delegated that to an external device, and I hope that you haven’t, and even if you have, I think the data you cut and pasted above would handle that correctly.
Beyond that, I think id be relying on Sonos support, in the hopes that a diagnostic would reflect a useful error when the Sonos system running on the speaker tries to reach out, using SMB, to the NAS.
I’ll keep watching this thread, hopefully I can learn a bit more. Best of luck!
Sorry, scanning some of the data above, and what I see is SMB v1 turned on in windows, but what I don’t see it is turned on (or off, either way) on the Buffalo Linkstation’s firmware. Sonos doesn’t go through Windows to access the library, the Unix computer in the Sonos device reads that data directly from the NAS, without involving Windows.
Or is the clip under the label SMB Settings from the Buffalo Linkstation’s software/firmware? It’s listed under the Windows 11 firewall settings, but that could just be a format thing. I’m afraid it’s been quite a few years since I retired my Buffalo device, so I’m unfamiliar with their settings page.
NAS Model: LS-CH1.0TL-EU
Hi Bruce,
Or is the clip under the label SMB Settings from the Buffalo Linkstation’s software/firmware? It’s listed under the Windows 11 firewall settings, but that could just be a format thing. I’m afraid it’s been quite a few years since I retired my Buffalo device, so I’m unfamiliar with their settings page.
Didn’t quite understand the above paragraph but I’ve posted a screenshot that displays the firmware and network settings.
The link to the user manual of my 2010’ish NAS is below.
The firmware was last updated a few years ago to 1.75. The only NAS settings that has been fiddled with or changed in the last 10 years has been this firmware update and that was years ago. The shareSonosZP was created around 2010’ish and everything was working fine till September 2022. It is unlikely that the issue is going to be in the NAS end because apart from it being turned on and off, nothing has changed on the NAS end.
It is possible that this is a network issue that will disappear when I move on from my current co-living place. And the reason I think it could be a network issue is because the network guys here have made changes to the network in the last month when the NAS was down so it is possible that’s where the issue is. The Sonos S1 controller was able to access the NAS from June to September in my current location till that Windows update changed the SMB settings around September. The network configuration in my current co-living place was changed in November 2022.
I’m reasonably techy and know my way around Unix better than Windows even though I’m capable of posting MAC addresses on a public forum but Corry fixed that issue! If you need any further information, please let me know.
I have known special characters in computer names to cause problems on Macs. Maybe also applies here? So lose the underscore?
Thanks, John. I’m not using a Mac. I’ve been using this NAS with the same settings/naming conventions for more than ten years so that is unlikely to be a factor. The issue started in September 2022 after windows update disabled SMB and the NAS disappeared.